Close

INT - EN

Select a country and, if applicable, a language.

Please note that some articles are only available in English.

Menu
close
Back to the Overview page
Country:Global
Language:English

Intranasal triamcinolone acetonide effectively improves nasal symptoms and quality of life in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis

EFSM: 2022;2:220022DOI: 10.52778/efsm.22.0022Publication date: 05.02.2022
Mohamed Amessou, PhD, Elizaveta Leshcheva, PharmD, Aleksandr Maslakov, MD, PhD and Palak Venkataraman, PharmD

Allergic rhinitis is a common problem with increasing prevalence. Two recent publications demonstrate that intranasal triamcinolone acetonide is an effective treatment that progressively improves nasal symptoms and quality of life in adult patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa affecting up to 40% of the general population worldwide. It can be either seasonal or perennial and is clinically defined by four classic symptoms including itching, sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion [1]. The pathophysiology of AR is a multifactorial, including genetic predisposition, immunological response, and environmental pollutants as causal factors. AR symptoms can impair quality of life and wellbeing and cause sleep disruption, absenteeism and decreased work productivity. The relief of AR symptoms can be assessed by validated scores such as the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS).
Intranasal corticosteroids are considered to be the most effective form of treatment for AR symptoms. A double-blind, parallel-group, phase III clinical trial randomized a total of 260 patients with persistent perennial AR to receive intranasal triamcinolone acetonide (220 µg per day as two 55 µg sprays in each nostril) or fluticasone propionate (200 µg per day as two 50 µg sprays in each nostril) for 28 days and found that both treatments were effective in decreasing rTNSS values [2]. Two recent publications have reported a post-hoc analysis of efficacy [3] and quality of life (QoL) [4] over the 28 day course with both treatments.

The post hoc efficacy publication assessed weekly changes in rTNSS for the total score (range: 0–16) and each of its four components and the proportion of patients reporting at least a 50% or 75% reduction in symptoms [3]. Both total score (Fig. 1) and individual symptom scores for sneezing, nasal itching, rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction progressively declined over time; such symptom improvement was statistically significant at each time point with both treatments. Triamcinolone showed continuous and consistent improvement in total rTNSS scores and for individual symptoms through the 4 weeks treatment period.

Fig. 1. Least square change from baseline in total rTNSS in the per protocol population. Reproduced with permission from [3] 
rTNSS = reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score; TAA = triamcinolone acetonide; FP = fluticasone propionate

The second study examined weekly QoL changes using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Qualify of Life questionnaire (miniRQLQ) [4]. Both treatments significantly improved the miniRQLQ scores, both overall and the five individual domains, including activity limitations and practical problems. Similar to symptom improvement, there was progressive improvement over time that was statistically significant at each weekly time points over the 4 weeks treatment period (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Least square mean changes in overall miniRQLQ. Reproduced with permission from [4].

In conclusion, intranasal triamcinolone demonstrated to be an effective treatment for adults with perennial AR that continuously and consistently improved nasal symptoms, as well as quality of life measures and was well tolerated over the 4 weeks of treatment.

 

Evidence_101_34_global-EN.pdf

File size: 61KB

Literature

  1. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008 Apr;63 Suppl 86:8–160.  
  2. Karaulov AV, Vylegzhanina T, Ovchinnikov A, Chernikova M, Nenasheva N. Triamcinolone acetonide versus fluticasone propionate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, parallel-group trial. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2019;179:142–51.
  3. Karaulov AV, Ilina NI, Shartanova N, Maslakov A, Lucio L. Triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis: a post hoc efficacy analysis of a phase III study performed in russia. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2021 Sep 14:1–8. Online ahead of print.  
  4. Karaulov AV, Nenasheva N, Smolkin Y, Maslakov A, Lucio L. Triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis: a post hoc analysis of quality of life during a phase III study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2021 Sep 6:1–8. Online ahead of print.

 

Conflict of interest: M. Amessou, E. Leshcheva, A. Maslakov and P. Venkataraman are employees of Sanofi.

Disclosures: Medical writing and publication funded by Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH.

Affiliation/Correspondence: Mohamed Amessou, PhD, Consumer Healthcare Sanofi, Gentilly, France, Elizaveta Leshcheva, PharmD, Aleksandr Maslakov, MD, PhD, Sanofi Consumer Healthcare, Moscow, Russia and Palak Venkataraman, PharmD, Sanofi Consumer Healthcare, 55 Corporate Drive Bridgewater, NJ 08807, US
Submission date: 18.11.2021Acceptance date: 07.01.2022Publication date: 05.02.2022
Back to the Overview page